Urban Autonomy Lab
Chapter 2 · EV108

SELF DRIVE Act of 2026 Advances to House Energy and Commerce Committee Markup — Federal Preemption of State AV Restrictions and Limited Commercial Operations During Testing — Mid-May 2026

Date collected: 18 May 2026
Summary

Bipartisan Latta/Dingell bill preempts state and local rules that "prohibit or partially prohibit" deployment; authorises commercial revenue during testing; first federal framework to include trucking

Headline Finding

The Safely Ensuring Lives Future Deployment and Research In Vehicle Evolution Act of 2026 — the SELF DRIVE Act — advanced to House Energy and Commerce Committee markup in the week of 12 May 2026. The bipartisan bill, introduced 5 February 2026 by Representatives Bob Latta (R-OH) and Debbie Dingell (D-MI), establishes a single federal regulatory framework for Automated Driving System-equipped vehicles, preempts state and local regulations that prohibit or partially prohibit AV deployment so long as manufacturers develop a “safety case,” and explicitly authorises the Secretary of Transportation to permit “limited commercial operations” by manufacturers and fleets while under a federal testing permit. The provision is structurally significant: it converts AV pilot programmes from cost centres into authorised revenue centres at the federal level — a move that the Eno Center for Transportation has characterised as the most significant federal AV policy shift since the original SELF DRIVE Act passed the House in 2017. Committee markup is the first procedural step toward floor consideration; the previous SELF DRIVE Act passed the House by voice vote in 2017 but died in the Senate. The 2026 version arrives during the same week as the Texas SB 2807 enforcement cliff (EV107), creating a possible federal-state preemption confrontation in the near term.

Detail

  • Bill text: H.R. 7390 — SELF DRIVE Act of 2026, 119th Congress.
  • Introduction: 5 February 2026 by Rep. Bob Latta (R-OH) and Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-MI).
  • Committee markup: House Energy and Commerce Committee, week of 12 May 2026 (per iDispatchHub reporting May 2026; verification: the SELF DRIVE Act of 2026 “heads to committee markup this week” per coverage in the week of 12 May 2026).
  • Core regulatory architecture:
    • Establishes federal framework for ADS-equipped vehicles under National Highway Traffic Safety Administration jurisdiction.
    • Preempts state and local rules that “prohibit or partially prohibit” AV deployment provided manufacturers develop a safety case in compliance with federal requirements.
    • Authorises Secretary of Transportation to permit “limited commercial operations” by manufacturers and fleets while operating under a federal testing permit — effectively converting pilots into authorised revenue programmes.
    • Establishes national autonomous truck safety framework alongside passenger AV framework — the first federal bill since 2017 to include heavy trucks within the same statutory framework as light-duty AVs.
    • Names specific operator categories that would benefit from federal preemption certainty: Bot Auto, Aurora, Waymo Via, Kodiak (autonomous trucking); Waymo, Tesla, Zoox, Nuro, Cruise-successor capabilities (light-duty).
  • Sponsors and political coalition:
    • Bipartisan sponsorship: Latta (R-OH) + Dingell (D-MI) — Energy and Commerce Committee senior members.
    • The Eno Center for Transportation has positioned the 2026 version as more politically viable than 2017 owing to (a) demonstrated operational scale at Waymo (EV106), (b) demonstrated bipartisan operator support (the Latta/Dingell coalition), and (c) the maturity of the autonomous trucking industry (Aurora, Kodiak — EV99, EV100).
  • Eno Center commentary: characterises the SELF DRIVE Act 2026 as the most significant federal AV policy shift since 2017.
  • Stakeholder positioning:
    • Operator coalition (industry): supports federal preemption certainty and the conversion of pilots into authorised commercial programmes.
    • Consumer Reports (consumer advocacy): has provided testimony to Congress urging that the bill “close safety gaps and protect consumers” — neither full opposition nor endorsement; conditional support contingent on amendments.
    • Independent carriers (autonomous trucking): mixed; some support the federal preemption pathway for cross-state operations, others are concerned about the small-carrier impact of federal-only safety case requirements.
  • Procedural pathway: committee markup → committee passage → House floor consideration → Senate Commerce Committee → Senate floor consideration → presidential signature. The 2017 version cleared the House by voice vote but died in the Senate Commerce Committee.

Governance Implication

Four points relevant to the paper:

  1. Federal preemption of state and local AV authority is the central regulatory-political battleground of 2026. SB 2807 (Texas, EV107) and California’s two-stage DMV/CPUC model represent the operative state-level regulatory frameworks. The SELF DRIVE Act 2026 would preempt state and local rules that “prohibit or partially prohibit” AV deployment. The ambiguity is in the meaning of “partially prohibit” — whether SB 2807’s serious-bodily-injury enforcement trigger, California’s CPUC permitting requirement, or Austin/NYC’s local council moratoriums and resistance (EV92, EV77) constitute “partial prohibitions” preempted by federal law. The CAM paper’s Ch.9 What To Do Now section should treat the federal-preemption question as the central US regulatory-political question of 2026–2027 — and explicitly distinguish technical-safety federalism (where federal standards are most appropriate) from behavioural-policy and coverage-allocation federalism (where the paper’s Institutional ODD framing argues for city-state authority).

  2. The “limited commercial operations under testing permit” provision is a structural acceleration mechanism. Authorising revenue generation during the testing phase materially changes operator incentives. Under the current framework, operators must complete testing and then transition to commercial operations. The SELF DRIVE Act 2026 would allow operators to begin revenue generation while still operating under testing permits — effectively extending the testing horizon at commercial scale. The CAM paper’s Ch.4 Stakes treatment of capital-market dynamics should treat this provision as a potential structural accelerant: it would allow capital-constrained operators (Kodiak AI Q1 2026 PIPE financing context, EV100) to generate revenue earlier in the regulatory lifecycle. The Ch.1 Pacing Problem framing should anticipate that, if enacted, the SELF DRIVE Act 2026 accelerates US AV deployment by an estimated 18–24 months relative to the state-by-state regulatory pathway.

  3. The inclusion of autonomous trucking in the same federal framework is the structural innovation of the 2026 version. The 2017 SELF DRIVE Act applied only to light-duty vehicles; the 2026 version explicitly includes heavy trucks. This is the first time a unified federal framework for both passenger AVs and autonomous trucking has reached committee markup. The Aurora-McLane partnership (EV99), the Kodiak AI Roehl operations (EV100), and the Hirschbach 500-truck commitment (Aurora) all become explicitly authorised under the SELF DRIVE Act 2026 framework. The CAM paper’s Ch.2 What is CAM taxonomy should treat the combined passenger-and-freight federal regulatory framework as a structural feature of US AV governance — distinct from the EU’s separation between Type-Approval (passenger) and freight-specific regimes.

  4. The political viability question remains open and a Senate-floor watching brief. The 2017 SELF DRIVE Act cleared the House by voice vote but died in the Senate. The 2026 version benefits from a more mature operator coalition, demonstrated operational scale, bipartisan sponsorship, and an autonomous-trucking lobby that did not exist in 2017. It also faces a more sophisticated opposition coalition: state attorneys general concerned about preemption, consumer advocacy organisations citing the Avride PE26-003 (EV97) and Tesla teleoperator-crash (EV104) findings, and city-level mayors and transportation departments concerned about behavioural-policy preemption. The CAM paper’s Ch.9 What To Do Now treatment of the US federal regulatory horizon should treat the Senate Commerce Committee as the operative chokepoint — and watch for whether the Avride and Tesla findings of the past 10 days are cited in Senate testimony.

The convergence of three federal regulatory tracks — SELF DRIVE Act 2026 committee markup, NHTSA PE26-003 ongoing investigation, and the Markey RAO legislation as a watching brief — makes the period from mid-May 2026 through the UNECE WP.29 June 2026 vote the operative federal regulatory window for the paper’s Ch.9 framing.

Sources

Thread