Urban Autonomy Lab
Chapter 8 · EV64

SELF DRIVE Act of 2026 Advances Through House Committee

Date collected: 13 April 2026
Summary

H.R. 7390 passes committee 12–11; federal preemption clause would override city-level AV governance

Headline Finding

The SELF DRIVE Act of 2026 (H.R. 7390), introduced by Representatives Latta and Dingell, passed the House Energy and Commerce Committee in a narrow 12–11 vote. If enacted, it would be the first federal statute dedicated to autonomous vehicle safety — but its federal preemption clause would override state and local regulations that prohibit or partially prohibit AV deployment.

Detail

  • Bill: H.R. 7390 — Safely Ensuring Lives Future Deployment and Research in Vehicle Evolution (SELF DRIVE) Act of 2026
  • Sponsors: Rep. Bob Latta, Rep. Debbie Dingell
  • Committee vote: Energy and Commerce Committee, 12–11 (narrow party-line passage)
  • Key provisions:
    • Expands NHTSA authority to establish safety standards specific to ADS-equipped vehicles
    • Requires manufacturers to develop and submit “safety cases” demonstrating ADS safety performance
    • Mandates cybersecurity planning
    • Establishes a National Automated Vehicle Safety Data Repository for crash data
    • Federal preemption: Preempts state and local regulations that prohibit or partially prohibit AV deployment, provided manufacturers submit a safety case
    • Directs NHTSA to develop testing, evaluation, and compliance processes
  • Legislative context: Congress takes up Surface Transportation Reauthorization in 2026 (current authorisation expires 30 September 2026); the SELF DRIVE Act could be folded into that larger vehicle
  • Industry response: Insurance industry trade associations sent mixed-response letters; the Teamsters opposed provisions covering commercial vehicles; Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety opposed the bill as insufficiently protective
  • Significance: The federal preemption clause is the most consequential provision for city-level governance. If enacted, it would prohibit cities from imposing fleet caps, operational restrictions, or deployment moratoria that go beyond what NHTSA requires — even if local conditions warrant additional governance.

Governance Implication

The SELF DRIVE Act’s federal preemption clause is a direct threat to the city-level governance toolkit the CAM paper advocates. If a federal safety case satisfies NHTSA, cities would lose the ability to impose additional conditions — fleet caps, kerb management requirements, data-sharing mandates, ODD restrictions based on local conditions. The 12–11 committee vote indicates this is politically contested, and the Surface Transportation Reauthorization timeline creates a window in which the bill could advance rapidly or be absorbed into a larger package. The paper’s argument for city-level Institutional ODD authority becomes more urgent if federal preemption progresses. The “safety case” requirement in the bill is structurally similar to the UNECE GTR approach (EV52) but the preemption mechanism is uniquely American and uniquely hostile to local governance autonomy.

Sources

Thread